AN EXPLORATION OF ELITE AND SUBALTERN
PERSPECTIVES IN AMITAV GHOSH’S ‘THE HUNGRY TIDE’
Dr Upendra Kumar Dwivedi, Sr.
Assistant Professor, Department of English, D.A.V. College, Kanpur
Abstract
In the postcolonial world, the issues of communication
and equality between the once-colonial people of the West and the previously colonized
peoples of the Eastern and Third World are ever-present. Without effective
communication and mutual respect existing between the two parties,
discrimination, and exploitation finds an opportunity to manifest. It is
therefore essential to form connections and relationships across the division
of the rich and the poor. This research paper
delves into the complicated depiction of elite and subaltern perspectives in
Amitav Ghosh’s ‘The Hungry Tide’, a singular set in the ecologically and
culturally precise Sundarbans area of India. How
Ghosh addresses socio-financial disparity, environmental conservation, and
cultural war can be explored through an investigation into the contrasting
experiences and viewpoints of the novel's characters. It follows Piyali Roy, an
Indian-American marine biologist, and Kanai Dutt, a rich businessman from
Delhi, as representatives of elite elegance. Their interactions with the
Sundarbans’ surroundings and its nearby inhabitants display their privileged
positions and regularly detached engagement with the area’s complexities. In
juxtaposition, the subaltern perspective is embodied with the aid of Fokir, a neighbourhood
fisherman whose lifestyle and understanding are deeply intertwined with the
natural rhythms and dangers of the Sundarbans. Fokir’s experiential wisdom and
precarious life spotlight the cruel realities confronted through the indigenous
community, underscoring problems of marginalization and survival.
This paper also analyses how Ghosh’s narrative
method correctly bridges these disparate worlds, providing a nuanced portrayal
of the strength dynamics and interdependencies between the elite and subaltern
characters. The novel's engagement with environmental concerns is huge because
it follows out the lines of tension between medical conservation efforts helmed
by outsiders and lived experiences of the nearby populace. By opening up space
for both views, Ghosh makes his case for a holistic and sensitive approach to
the environment and social problems, paying heed to the need to embed
indigenous understanding in tackling socio-monetary inequalities. Through an
essential examination of person improvement, thematic factors, and narrative
shape, this paper also pursuits to explain how ‘The Hungry Tide’ no longer
reflects the complexities of the Sundarbans however also serves as a broader
observation on global issues of environmental justice and socio-monetary
disparity. The findings underscore the need for inclusivity and mutual
admiration in dealing with conservation and human development challenges that are
intertwined.
Keywords:
Elite,
Subaltern, Postcolonialism, Social hierarchy, Power dynamics, Environmentalism,
Cultural identity, Marginalization, Indigenous communities, Colonialism, Ecocriticism,
& Socioeconomic disparity
Amitav Ghosh is the most renowned of the Indian writers
of troubled narratives that intertwine history, lifestyle, and politics,
reflecting the problematic postcolonial identification. His literary
importance lies in his capacity to traverse distinctive time durations and geographies,
by growing a wealthy tapestry that challenges readers to rethink historical and
current issues. Bengali refugees displaced during the partition of Bengal in
1947 and Bangladesh’s war of independence in 1971 eventually settled in the
Sundarbans and faced challenges associated with these events. In the 1940s and
1950s, some slept in inhospitable surroundings while others sought refuge in
the Calcutta countryside. Many fled the harsh conditions in the Dandakaranya
jungle camp. In 1978, a group established a self-sufficient community on the
island of Morichzhapi, with towns, schools, markets, etc. that show flexibility
and adaptability.
‘The Hungry Tide’ is a compelling novel that
intricately weaves collectively non-public and political narratives set in the
Sundarbans, a far away and treacherous region of India. Sundarbans is a remote
archipelago in the Bay of Bengal, which serves as a unique backdrop for
exploring small, beautiful figures. It is the story
of Piya Roy, an American marine biologist of Indian origin, who reaches
Sundarbans to conduct research on the rare Irrawaddy dolphins. Her travel
coincides with that of Kanai Dutt, who travels across the land to decipher a
mysterious notebook left behind by his deceased uncle, Nirmal. The
narrative additionally and prominently proves Fokir, an illiterate but
knowledgeable fisherman, whose profound connection to the Sundarbans becomes
central to the unfolding drama. Ghosh’s depiction of the Sundarbans is not only
a setting but also a symbolic embroidery of natural beauty and danger. Through characters such as Pia Roy, an American-Indian
pediatrician, and Kanai Dutt, a Delhi translator of note, Ghosh explores
divergent worldviews, creates aversion to struggle, while underlining variety
for the residents. As Kanai comments:
It
struck him that for all its squalor and poverty, this village had the same form
of completeness and autonomy that he had discovered in the Sundarbans
(P. 102).
The novel also highlights the voices of
subaltern characters, such as Fokir, an illiterate but intelligent fisherman
with a deep connection to land and water. Fokir betrays a deep knowledge and
has a great respect for Nature, which Ghosh examines deeply in the novel. The
novel also explores issues of marginalization and socio-economic inequality by
providing contrasting views. It shows how elites and immigrants coexist in the
same physical space but experience radically different realities. This sheds
light on broader social, political, and environmental issues.
By framing the story of a historical
expedition or placing historiography next to the story, the issue of
representation is at stake, operating and speaking from certain subjective
positions, leaving almost no scope for stitching big narratives together. ‘The
Hungry Tide’ is a postmodern novel, that balances all its storylines, and the
multifaceted rendition of the history of the Morichjhapi Revolution has been
under severe criticism in the past and has raised controversy regarding
subaltern studies.
The term “Subaltern” refers to an oppressed
class in the historical framework of hegemonic power while the terms “subalterns”
refer to an oppressed class that is no longer connected to industrial labour.
The term “subaltern” was borrowed from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci,
in 1971, where the term “Subalterno” is used as a euphemism for the proletariat,
as stated in the Encyclopaedia of Postcolonial Studies. Thus, subaltern history
is ‘history from the below,’ offering a voice to people whose histories have
been omitted. When subaltern research first emerged in India, it was to contest
the then-existing historiography of Indian nationalism, which gave no place to
official and elitist versions of the movement struggles of the poor and the
outcast.
First to be considered will be the writings of
Edward Said, Fanon, and Spivak concerning colonial dominance of colonized
peoples, subaltern voices, and postcolonial theory. As Said says: “European
culture gained in strength and identity by setting itself off against the
Orient as a sort of surrogate and even underground self “(Said 3). The
dominance that the West assumes over the East is in turn reflected by the
superiority that the cosmopolitan assumes over the countryman, as this
statement reflects. It is this kind of relationship that is represented by
Ghosh between his characters Kanai and Fokir; it is the strict Indian caste
system that divides them. Kanai belongs to a higher caste than Fokir, and this
distinction mimics colonial power over colonized subjects. The Hungry Tide in
its entirety constantly comes back to this subaltern relationality; the
educated, westernized reader responds to both the Western and Eastern elite
characters and the impoverished Eastern Indian characters within the novel, and
the elite Western and Eastern characters respond to the impoverished Indian
characters and in turn the reader and the characters respond to the animals in
the novel - namely the tigers - and adding one more thread to this relational
web, both the rural poor and the tigers all have to potential to turn against
their elite oppressors. All these inter-relationships and relations are
multi-layer and are always in changing combinations of power and understanding.
Where the subaltern is facing the cosmopolitan
and is at the mercy of the metropolitan power, the poor of India, as described
in the novel, come face to the authority values and language of the elite.
Thus, it references colonial dominance over
colonized peoples, but it also serves as an exemplar of how the country views
the city: inferior, uneducated, and, ultimately, inconsequential. It is the will
of the cosmopolitan world that the country is forced to yield to, and the city
that imposes its rule over the rural confronting it with its metropolitan
language and lifestyle, primarily in the relationship between Kanai and Fokir
that this hierarchy gets displayed in The Hungry Tide. The city dwellers view
the country dwellers with suspicion and have the notion that they cannot make
enough informed choices concerning their lives and therefore require persuasion
and regulation. In apartheid, the same value held of the East: under colonial
rule, it was assumed that the East embodied a lack of reason and was therefore
in need of the supply of reason that the West held. This dominance is portrayed
in The Hungry Tide through the treatment applied by the authorities on the
people of the Tide country; according to them, these people are: ‘too poor to
matter’. They are therefore disregarded in favour of the desires of the West
and the conservation of the tide country is carried out with no regard to the
wellbeing of the people that live there.
In the following lines, from Fanon’s work,
Spivak discusses how to allow subaltern voices to become a material force in
resistance to the strength of colonial and elite powers. In building from
Fanon, the subaltern must confront 'the language of the civilizing nation' 14
whilst constructing ways in which to speak back. As will be explained: 'the
term 'subaltern' is applied to signify the many different peoples who did not
constitute the colonial elite. These could be “the small rural gentry, poor landlords,
wealthy peasants, and upper-middle-class peasants” (Barry 109). In the case of ‘The
Hungry Tide’, the subalterns are the rural poor of West Bengal. When such poor Eastern
people inhabit a world that is dominated by the West, the question needs to be
addressed regarding how these voiceless people can have their voices heard and
their opinions counted for anything of importance, as Spivak observes:
But
we are now, I hope, at the following question: On the other side of the
international division of labour from socialized capital, in and beyond the
circuit of the epistemic violence of imperialist law and education
supplementing an earlier economic text, can the subaltern speak?
(Spivak 283)
For Spivak, the concern is that the subaltern
is being politically and socially silenced, an injustice that must be resolved.
She suggests some resolve exists in the narrative that elite Indians can
provide on behalf of the subaltern Indians, but this is still not sufficient:
Certain
varieties of the Indian elite are at best native informants for first-world
intellectuals interested in the voice of the Other. But one must nevertheless
insist that the colonized subaltern subject is irretrievably heterogeneous
(Spivak 284).
Subaltern studies, particularly the paintings
of Spivak, emphasize the difficulty of representing subaltern voices inside
dominant frameworks. In her seminal essay, “Can the Subaltern Speak?”, Spivak
argues that subalterns are frequently spoken for by way of others, rather than
being allowed to articulate their very own reports. Ghosh’s narrative strategy
aligns with this critique by providing a platform for Fokir’s voice, albeit
filtered via the perspectives of Piya and Kanai. This narrative choice
highlights the inherent demanding situations in bridging the gap between elite
and subaltern reports.
Furthermore, the ancient context of the
Morichjhãpi incident inside the novel serves as a vital backdrop for expertise in
the systemic marginalization of subaltern organizations. Ghosh uses the individual
of Nirmal, whose notebook recounts the tragic events, to foreground the
political and social injustices faced by the refugees. This ancient layering
enriches the novel’s exploration of subaltern narratives, supplying a stark
reminder of the results of elite indifference and country violence.
One
of the imperative themes in ‘The Hungry Tide’ is the conflict between modernity
and subculture. Piya and Kanai represent the elite, urban, and knowledgeable
segments of society, bringing with them scientific understanding and
metropolitan sensibilities. In evaluation, Fokir and the nearby population embody
traditional wisdom and an intrinsic bond with Nature. This dichotomy is obvious
when Kanai displays his surroundings.
The
elite narratives are embodied via characters like Piya Roy and Kanai Dutt. Piya
represents the voice of clinical authority and modernity. Her perspective is
usual via her education and upbringing within the United States, which makes her
distance herself from the neighbourhood realities of the Sundarbans and Kanai,
in addition to embodying the city. His initial notion of the Sundarbans is
tinged with a sense of superiority and detachment. This is obvious whilst he
muses:
It
struck him that for all its squalor and poverty, this village had the identical
kind of completeness and autonomy that he had located in the Sundarbans
(P. 102).
This quote highlights the contrasting
perceptions of the same environment by way of those from special social strata.
Contrasting these elite views are the
subaltern voices, the most considerably represented by Fokir, an illiterate
fisherman, whose deep expertise of the Sundarbans is rooted in lived revel in
instead of formal training. Fokir’s connection to his environment is intuitive
and holistic, a stark contrast to Piya’s clinical detachment. This is
poignantly captured within the passage wherein Ghosh writes:
Fokir
did not go searching. His eyes were fixed on the water as though he had been
studying an eBook. His attention become so complete that it seemed not possible
to assume he may be conscious of anything else.
(P. 172).
Fokir’s
attitude is emblematic of the subaltern narrative, which frequently remains
underrepresented in mainstream discourse. Thus, ‘The Hungry Tide’ engages
deeply with the subject matters of elite and subaltern narratives, reflecting
broader scholarly discussions in postcolonial and subaltern studies.
There
is a great role of Gramsci’s concept of sovereignty in Ghosh’s ‘The Hungry Tide’
that can be used to understand the complex interactions between elites and
minorities, as well as their worldviews. Antonio Gramsci’s concept of hegemony
refers to the dominant group’s cultural, ideological, and moral leadership over
subordinate groups.
The
characters of Piya Roy and Kanai Dutt portray protagonists who focus on
education, science, and urban curiosities. Piya, a marine biologist who wants
to study Irrawaddy dolphins, takes a scientific mind to the people of
Sundarban. Her approach reflects a hegemonic discourse of scientific
rationality and conservation, which often ignores or undermines the traditional
environmental knowledge of local communities. This dynamic is evident when Piya
and Fokir’s interactions reveal an initial inability to fully appreciate her
understanding of the environment. Ghosh writes, “Piya found herself looking at
the water through Fokir’s eyes; The sight was so different from what he knew
that he couldn’t help but wonder” (P. 172). Piya’s shock here suggests a
momentary breakdown of her authoritarian worldview as she begins to realize the
validity of Fokir’s knowledge. Kanai's behavior further illustrates the
influence of the authoritarianism of urban educational elites. His initial
disdain for the local village community reflects his internalization of strong
cultural values that prioritized intellectual and financial capital
over indigenous knowledge.
This
village, for all its pollution and poverty, has the same fullness and freedom
that he found in the beautiful forest,
speaks Kanai. (P. 102)
This observation underscores his detached,
almost pro-colonial view of the way hegemonic ideologies establish social and
economic regimes. Thus, Gramsci’s concept of sovereignty also helps to
contextualize the historical context of the Morichjhapi case, where refugees
were forcibly removed from the Sundarbans Narrated by Nirmal’s notebook.
In ‘The Hungry Tide’, Ghosh illustrates the perspective
of protagonists through characters like Nilima Bose, whose role and actions
shape narrative and power structures more in the novel. Founded by, Nirmal’s
wife, Nilima Bose, the Badabon Trust embodies an elite mentality of progress
and change. Her efforts to bring development and healthcare to the impoverished
areas of the Sundarbans underscore her commitment to social justice. But her
methods and framework often reflect the limitations and biases of a high
worldview. Nilima’s approach to development and support is centred around
modern and rational principles, emphasizing structured interventions rather
than traditional skills and practices. This is evident in the clinics and
schools as she established the institutions. They are symbolic structures of
the elites’ reliance on knowledge and structured, standardized care. Her
interaction with the community is characterized by a mixture of empathy and
authority. She does so by conflating a paternalistic disturbance of her own
place in the elite with a strong sense of authority. This is especially evident
in her treatment of Kanai, who invites him to the Sundarban, reflecting her
belief in the power of educated individuals to bring about change. As she tells
Kanai, “I need someone like you, to be able to read and write and understand
the outside world” (P. 59). This line highlights her reliance on the skills and
opinions of elites to effect change, reinforcing the idea that progress is
driven by those with education and resources.
This analysis highlights the importance of
including postcolonial perspectives in order to fully appreciate the nexus of
elite and colonial perspectives in shaping narratives and power structures
within the novel, suggesting that they can subaltern voices could be
marginalized.
In
‘The Hungry Tide’, Ghosh also intricately weaves a look at elites and
colonists, highlighting their interactions, conflicts, and occasional
cooperation. Characters like Piya Roy and Kanai Dutt especially represent the
main character’s point of view in the novel. Educated in the United States, Piya
was a marine biologist from India, with a global scientific and global outlook.
Her early approach to forest beauty is based on her knowledge and Western
education, with an emphasis on first-hand observation and rational analysis.
This idea emerges when she reflects on her scientific mission: “Piya had come
to study baboons; He was there to gather information, not to investigate human
suffering” (P. 129). This throws light on her professional detachment, and the
limitations imposed by mainstream scientific discourse on full engagement with
humans and complex environments the emphasis. Kanai Dutt represents a new
dimension of elite perspective. Well-Educated and well-versed, he initially
looks at the Sundarbans through the coloured glasses by the cause of his urban
upbringing and psychology. Often, what he ordered, reflects a degree of deviation
from his culture, as shown by his attitude toward the village:
This
village, with all its dirt and poverty afterwards, it had the same completeness
and freedom that he had seen in the beautiful forest.
(P. 102).
Interactions between major and minor
characters often create conflict and tension in the story. The novel
illustrates how the hegemony of elite discourses can marginalize and ignore the
subtle realities of life. This is exemplified in Nilima Bose’s deliberate but
sometimes paternalistic efforts to bring development to the lush forest, which
can inadvertently reinforce existing structures of power in postcolonial
thinking so, how conceptions of domination, ideology, structures and limit
subaltern agency and representation. Thus, the novel offers a compelling
portrait of elite-colonial interactions, highlighting the intersections of
power, knowledge, and identity in a post-colonial context through its characters.
Language
also plays an important role in the presentation of dominant sub-ideas in the
novel. Prominent figures like Piya Roy and Kanai Dutt often speak in the
language of their urban education. Ghosh uses various narrative techniques to portray
the minor characters, using language, images, and symbols to represent their
point of view in the novel. These techniques are not alike. It, not only
enriches the story, but also adds power, dynamics, and cultural identity. The representation of small, and dominant
ideas further enhances the imagery and symbolism in the novel.
Epilogising Elite and subaltern perspective, Ghosh
deftly explores the interactions between elites and minorities, crafting a
comprehensive narrative that reveals broader social structures and power dynamics
in the novel. Through characters like Fokir, who has a deep connection with the
people of Sundarban based on personal experiences and spiritual beliefs, Ghosh
challenges the marginalization of immigrants and highlights their resilience.
The novel’s analysis of elite and colonial ideologies resonates with
postcolonial theory, providing insights into how ideologies support social
structures. Ghose’s narrative strategies, including language, imagery, and
symbolism, argue that the discourses of elite’s shape knowledge and constrain
new ideas.
References
·
Boehmer, Elleke. ‘Stories
of Women: Gender and Narrative in the Postcolonial Nation’. Manchester
University Press, 2005.
·
Chakravarty, Gautam. ‘The
Indian Postcolonial: A Critical Reader’. Routledge, 2010.
· Fanon,
Franz. Black Skin White Masks. Trans. Markmann, Charles Lam. St Albans:
Paladin, 1970.
· Ghosh,
Amitav. ‘The Hungry Tide’. Mariner Books, 2005.
· Ghosh,
Amitav. ‘In an Antique Land’. Granta Books, 1992.
· Ghosh,
Amitav. ‘The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable’. University
of Chicago Press, 2016.
·
Guha, Ranajit and Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty eds. Selected
Subaltern Studies. Oxford: OUP, 1988.
· Hutnyk,
John. ‘Critique of Exotica: Music, Politics and the Culture Industry’. Pluto
Press, 2000.
· Landry,
Donna and Maclean, Gerald eds. The Spivak Reader. New York: Routledge,
1996.
· Loomba,
Ania. ‘Colonialism/Postcolonialism’. Routledge, 1998.
· Morton,
Stephen. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. New York: Routledge, 2003.
· Parry,
Benita. ‘Postcolonial Studies: A Materialist Critique’. Routledge, 2004.
· Tomsky,
Terri. “Amitav Ghosh’s Anxious Witnessing and the Ethics of Action in The
Hungry Tide.” PS: Journal of Commonwealth Literature (2009) vol 44:
53-65
·
Said, Edward. Orientalism:
Western Conceptions of the Orient. 1978. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1995.
·
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty.
“Can the Subaltern Speak?” 1988. The Postcolonial Studies Reader,2nd
ed. Eds. Ashcroft, Bill. Griffiths, Gareth, and Tiffin, Helen. New York:
Routledge, 2005.