A SWOT ANALYSIS OF BLENDED
LEARNING IN ACHIEVING THE GOALS OF NATIONAL EDUCATION POLICY 2020
Antara
Mukherjee
Research
Scholar
Dept.
of Education, Central University of Jharkhand, Ranchi, India
antaramukherjee02@gmail.com
Dr.
Shashi Singh
Associate
Professor
Dept.
of Education, Central University of Jharkhand. Ranchi, India
ABSTRACT
Education,
vital for societal advancement, has evolved in response to changing needs,
learner expectations, technological expansion, and the implementation of New Education
Policy (NEP)-2020 that is aimed towards global competitiveness in the Indian
education system. Additionally, Covid-19 pandemic expedited India’s digital
transformation, propelling blended learning into prominence, offering huge
scope in accomplishingNEP-2020goals. This paper critically reviewed existing
literature to assess the effectiveness of blended learning vis-à-vis NEP-2020’s
vision. A SWOT analysis was performed to identify its potential as a
facilitator or barrier to NEP-2020 objectives. Additionally, the paper explored
opportunities, essential guidelines and lessons learned to ensure that blended
learning serves as an enabler in attaining the NEP-2020 aspirations. Understanding
the benefits and hurdles of blended learning, would empower policymakers,
educators, and stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding its integration
into the education system for the successful execution of NEP-2020, leading to
transformation of the educational landscape in India.
Keywords:
National education policy (NEP): 2020, Blended learning, SWOT (Strength,
Weakness, Opportunity, Threat) analysis.
INTRODUCTION
The
Indian education system, rooted in the ancient Gurukul traditions and
influenced by colonial legacies, has evolved into a globally competitive, digitally
self-sufficient system. Driven by changing needs, technological development, emergence
of new policies, and prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic, our education system
has undergone huge transmutation. Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s
leadership, the introduction of the National Education Policy-2020, aims to
address 21st century needs, emphasizing on access, equity, and
inclusivity, while promoting a dynamic knowledge society. NEP-2020 encourages
the extensive use of technology in all facets of education, along with
integrating India’s rich culture, values, and traditions. Therefore, blending
online education with experiential and activity-based learning (p. 59 of
NEP-2020 draft), by integrating quality online resources with the prevailing
higher education institutions’ curriculum. (Gulati et al.,2023) also
investigated that there is an increase in the online trends among the college
students for educational resources. Meantime, amidst the COVID-19 crisis, blended
learning emerged as the preferred model for sustainable education. Blended
learning (BL)that combines traditional face-to-face teaching with online
computer-mediated instructions (Graham, 2006), is considered as the “new
normal” in education (Norberg et. al.,2011). BL offers a mix of offline and
online learning, providing wide range of learning methods and modes (Bakar,
2021). There are various definitions of blended learning by many scholars, but
the major concept acknowledged is the integration of virtual and physical
environments in learning. However, its success depends on effective
instructional design and pedagogical approaches (Luca, 2006). King and
McSporran (2005) emphasized the need to consider the strengths and limitations
of different methods when blending them, providing a framework for effective
implementation.
NEP-2020 advocates a student-centric
education where learners can take any subject combinations and can also have
multiple entry and exit points in their academic career. In view of this,
blended learning comes out as a game-changer by allowing students to design and
seamlessly steer their own leaning according to their choice. Recognizing its
benefits, the University Grants Commission mandated a 40:60 ratio of online and
offline learning for higher education institutions. Ruling out a predominant
screen-based education and accepting the essential social, affective, and
psychomotor aspects of learning, BL is gaining huge popularity worldwide. While many articles have discussed the
incorporation of blended learning in education, a comprehensive review is still
missing on the potential of this learning approach aligned with the NEP-2020
goals, which can establish a theoretical foundation for subsequent empirical
studies. Such an overview based on secondary research evidence, can provide an
in-depth analysis of blended learning’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities,
and threats to education, in short by SWOT analysis, a tool used since 1950’s
for strategic planning in organisations (Benzaghta et al., 2021), which is
extensively used in different fields including education.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Blended Learning as an enabler towards achieving NEP-2020 aspirations.
Issues
such as a lack of trained teachers, educational resources, facilities, and high
dropout ratesplague education systems globally (UNESCO, 2002). Addressing the
issues,NEP-2020 uptakes Quality, Affordability, Equity, Access, and
Accountability in education as the immediate challenges that needs to be fixed.
Gauging the needs, blended learninghas gained popularityin
universities worldwide for raising the bar of education, increasing pass rates,
reducing learning cost, being flexible and overcoming geographical barriers (Kumar
et al., 2021).Even teachers and students are positive
towards employing blended learning approaches in their teaching (Saboowala&
Mishra, 2021).
Quality Education:Quality education for
all is a major concern in India. Quality management concerns apply to both
quality principles as well as quality management methods (Mukhopadhyay, 2001,
p. 14). Numerous studies and educators worldwide have acknowledged that blended
learning is highly effective in increasing students’ achievement score in all
levels of education and courses (Kundu et.al., 2021; López-Pérez
et al., 2011; Balakrishnan et al., 2021, Garnham & Kaleta, 2002), indicating improve in the quality of education (Twigg, 2003). Blended
learning also increases students’ motivation and satisfaction(Ranjan, 2020; Means
et al., 2013). Further, being conducted in a collaborative setting it promises
to adhere to our cultural, ethical, and social context (Bansal, 2014). The in-person
component of blended learning promotes humanistic features like enhancing feeling
of community among students and through adequate use of the institution
infrastructure (Rovai & Jordan, 2004; Dziuban and Moskal, 2001)
collectively improves the quality of education.
Accessibility:Due to the challenges
posed by a large population,traditional education systems struggle to reach
everyone,with improper infrastructure,
socio-economic, linguistic, and physical barriers (Bhattacharya and Sharma,
2007) hindering access to education.Blended learning
promises lucrative opportunity for all types of students,irrespective of their
time, geographical area, and situation (Horn &Staker, 2015).Additionally,itpresents
a significant opportunity for adult learners to pursue higher education (Rovai
& Jordan, 2004) without hampering their daily life.
Affordability:
Blended learning is cost-effective (Twigg, 2003; Kennedy,
2021), and successful in reducing drop-out rates (López-Pérez et
al., 2011; Dziuban et al., 2018). In such mixed learning environment, students
get the freedom to personalize their learning pace and path based on their
interests and needs (Babaeva and Khasanova, 2020).Being a tailormade approach
it gives utmost importance to students’ needs and convenience, and teachers can
leverage this approach according to their needs (Mukherjee, 2024).
Equity
and Inclusivity:
Blended learning fosters autonomy and equality among students (Gülbahar&Madran,
2019), but carefulimplementation and designingare crucial to ensure quality
education regardless of background.In inclusive
classrooms, face-to-face interaction with the special educators along with
access to virtual resources, enhances learning outcomes(Jennifer
Hall Rivera, 2017). Blended learning’s scaffolding capabilitiesand ability to reduce absenteeism in
special education classes (McCown, 2014;Keramidas, 2012), make it adaptable for special students.
Despite its potential to promote inclusivity in education, challenges like lack
of digital literacy among students (Chen, 2010), technical issues (McCown,
2014)andinsufficient training of special education teachers in blended
instructional models remain barriers to its successful implementation.However,inclusive
education teachers show favourable attitude and willingness towards adopting
blended learning practices in inclusive classrooms(Claudio, 2023).
Challenges for blended learning:Availability of online resources,efficiently trained teachers
(Osguthorpe & Graham, 2003), organisational readiness, motivated faculties,
along with proper feedback channels (Tabor, 2007) play crucial role in the
proper enactment of blended learning courses.Brown, (2016) in his studyreported
that while using online technology for instruction, teachers and students arefacing
difficulties such as technological anxiety, complexity, and illiteracy.But
despite the teachers’ lack of preparation, they are eager to include this
learning style in their lessons (Kundu et. al., 2014).Due to inadequate
undergraduate education in this field, all participants acknowledged lack of
comprehension of the blended learning models and application processes (Bursa,
2003).
MEANS, B., TOYAMA, Y., MURPHY, R.,
& BAKI, M. (2013). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ONLINE AND BLENDED LEARNING: A
META-ANALYSIS
OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE. TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD,115(3), 1–4
MEANS, B., TOYAMA, Y., MURPHY, R.,
& BAKI, M. (2013). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ONLINE AND BLENDED LEARNING: A
META-ANALYSIS
OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE. TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD,115(3), 1–4
METHODOLOGY
The study is Qualitative descriptive
in nature. The researcher consulted online articles and journals available in
Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate as the literature source and
the findings focused solely on blended learning, its challenges, achievements,
and potentialities aligned with NEP-2020 recommendations. The following
research questions forms the framework of the study:
Figure 1: Research
questions towards SWOT analysis of blended learning
SWOT ANALYSIS OF BLENDED
LEARNING
The
assessment of literature provides the following summary of the (strengths,
weaknesses) internal and external factors (opportunities, threats) of blended
learning that aligns with the visions of NEP-2020.
Strengths-
The strength portrays the advantages of
blended learning like being more efficient and focused as contrast to either
pure traditional or the pure online learning mode (Singh, 2003), thuscreating a
robust educational process, promoting active engagement by discarding passive methodologies.It enables
ubiquitous access to education, resulting in significant time and cost savings
while concurrently reducing transport expenses. Furthermore, it facilitates
enhanced learning retention through accessible recordings, enhances ICT skills
acquisition and students’ overall achievement. Aligned with student-centric
ethos of NEP-2020, blended learning empowers learners with greater autonomy and
control over their learning process. It advocates a flexible, convenient, and
interesting learning environment, fostering satisfaction and motivation among
students.
Weakness- Weaknesses
depicts the factors that prevents blended learning in achieving its full potential
and decreases its influences on the NEP-2020 goals.Firstly, blended learning ishighly dependent on strong network and electricity.
Studies indicate that inadequate network infrastructure disrupts online
classes, assignment submissions, and exam process for both students and
educators. In a country like India, most students face financial crisis and
thus cannot afford uninterrupted internet facility or own personal computers, consequently
facing difficulties in accessing blended learning materials. Along with
being a time-taking approach, increased workload for teachers stands a weak
point, as they find it difficult to prepare instructions in a mixed method
style keeping in mind the intricacies of BL objectives. As blended learning is very new in India, proper techniques and models
are yet to get developed and implemented practically in classrooms. Poor
integration of online and offline mode and lack of proper planning stages a
weakness of this approach.
Opportunities: Blended
learning bridges the gap towards accessing quality education for
underprivileged children, improving academic performance and welfare (Dey
&Bandyopadyay, 2019). It facilitates learner-centric teaching initiatives
(Ranjan, 2020) where learners hold the pivotal place and emerge as
self-directed learners. Students can study at their own schedule, speed, and location,
thus enjoy ultimate flexibility. The learning approach enhances social
competencies and increases opportunities of collaboration and in-person
communication. Advocating a personalised teaching experience tailored by the
instructors, it caters to students with different learning styles. Moreover, it
facilitates remote connections between students and teachers while allowing
in-person communication when necessary.During the COVID-19, blended learning
emerged as a well-suited approach, signalling its role as the newest trend in
education.
Threats- Rapid
changes in policies, technologies, and circumstances possess the biggest threat
towards new approaches. Dearth of dynamic, tech-savvy, and well-trained
teachers, with broad mindset and scientific attitude, proficient in both online
and offline modes (Lalima &Dangwal, 2017) are major issuestowards achieving
the goals outlined by NEP-2020. Technological illiteracy among students and
teachers is again a big challenge (Brown, 2016), compounded by inadequate
internet and computer facilities (Lalima & Dangwal, 2017).Additionally, in highly populated Indian classrooms,
BL becomes a chaotic endeavour.Lack of proper classroom infrastructure, teachers’
knowledge gaps(Alam et al., 2022; Jagadeesh
and Manjula, 2022), and stakeholders’ resistance, possess major external threats
towards incorporating blended approach in the classrooms. Additionally, funding
shortages impede the establishment of necessary infrastructure, training, and
resources needed for running blended courses in institutions.
RECOMMENDATIONS
This
SWOT assessment of blended learning reveals its potential in education, which
also highlights specific challenges (depicted in Figure 2) that strikes as a
barrier towards achieving NEP-2020 goals. Blended learning, encompassing its
beneficial and detrimental effects, is still in its early stage, necessitating
further empirical investigation.
Figure 2: SWOT analysis of blended
learning as an enabler of NEP2020 goals
The
objective of this analysis is to support the effective implementation of NEP-2020
and the overall advancement of education in India. Considering the results, the
researchers recommended-
·
To invest in robust and
sustainable digital infrastructure, including reliable internet and power supply
across all regions.
·
Develop comprehensive
teacher preparation courses to equip educators with essential abilities and
knowledge for blended learning.
·
Conduct awareness
campaigns and stakeholder engagement initiatives to promote the benefits of
blended learning and address concerns.
·
Adopt phased approaches,
starting with trail programmes and progressively expanding them based on best
practices and lessons learned.
·
Continuously monitor and
evaluate the implementation process and make data-driven decisions for
improvement and refinement.
CONCLUSION
While
exploring these aspects, policymakers, educators, and stakeholders must
collaborate to leverage the strengths, address the weakness, seize the
opportunities, and mitigate the threats associated with blended learning to effectively
realise the vision outlined in the new education policy. Through strategy
planning, innovation and commitment, blended learning can emerge as a
transformative force in advancing educational excellence and equity in the 21st
century. Undoubtedly, Blended learning strengths are more than its possible
threats. A teacher is required to wisely plan and use the offline and online
resources to enable effective learning among students.
REFERENCES
Alam, S., Albozeidi, H. F., Al-Hawamdeh, B. O. S.,
& Ahmad, F. (2022). Practice and Principle of Blended Learning in ESL/EFL
Pedagogy: Strategies, Techniques and Challenges. International Journal of
Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i11.29901
Babaeva,
V. T., & Khasanova, K. F. (2020). Blended learning - education of the third
generation. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 1(81), 623-626.
Bakar, R.A. (2021). Blended Learning - An Innovative
Process. International Journal of Advanced
Research in Education and Society.
Balakrishnan, A., Puthean, S., Satheesh, G.,
M.K.U., Rashid, M., Nair, S., and Thunga, G. (2021). Effectiveness of blended learning in pharmacy
education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252461
Bansal,
P. (2014). Blended Learning in Indian Higher Education: Challenges and
Strategies. International Journal of Applied Research and Studies (iJARS). 3(2).
ISSN: 2278-9480.
M. A., A., M., I.,
& M. (2021). SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature
review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148
Bhattacharya, I., & Sharma, K. (2007). India in
the knowledge economy - An electronic paradigm. In International Journal of
Educational Management. 21(6)
Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional
practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use
of online tools in face-to-face teaching. Internet and Higher Education,
31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001
Bursa, S. (2023). The view of prospective social studies
teachers on blended learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education,
24(1), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1018486
Chen, H.
Y. (2010). Online reading comprehension strategies among fifth- and sixth-grade
general and special education students. Education, Research and
Perspectives, 37(2), 79-109.
Claudio, G. C. (2023). Attitude and Readiness of
Special Education Teachers in Blended Teaching: Basis for A Training
Development Program. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 3. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v3i1.74
Dey, P., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2019). Blended
learning to improve quality of primary education among underprivileged school
children in India. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9832-1
Dziuban, C., and Moskal, P. (2001).
Evaluating distributed learning in metropolitan universities. Metropolitan
Universities, 12(1), 41 – 49.
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D.,
Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and
emerging technologies. Int J EducTechnol High Educ, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to
hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6)
Graham, C. R. (2006).
Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. Handbook
of Blended Learning, 3-21
Gülbahar, Y., &Madran, R. O. (2009).
Communication and collaboration, satisfaction, equity, and autonomy in blended
learning environments: A case from Turkey. International Review of Research
in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2)
Gulati, D.D.K., Yadav, S., & Sharma, P. (2023). Online Trends among college youth. In Proceedings of the 1st Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies (PAMIR 2023)(pp.684-689). SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications. DOI: 10.5220/0012501000003792
Horn, M.
B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve
schools. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN: 978-1-118-95515-4
Jagadeesh,
S., & Manjula, H. S. (2022, June). Blended learning in NEP – challenges and
opportunities. IJCRT, 10(6). ISSN: 2320-2882
Jennifer H. R. (2017). The Blended Learning
Environment: A Viable Alternative for Special Needs Students. Journal of
Education and Training Studies. 5(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.2125
Kennedy, E. (2021, February).
Blended learning in teacher education and training: Findings from research and
practice. European Schoolnet.
Keramidas,
C. G. (2012). Are Undergraduate Students Ready for Online Learning? A
Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Sections of a Course. Rural Special
Education Quarterly, 31(4), 25-32.
https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051203100405
King, C., & Mcsporran, M. (2005). Blended Is
Better: Choosing Educational Delivery Methods. Proceedings of World
Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications.
Kumar, A., Krishnamurthi, R., Bhatia, S., Kaushik,
K., Ahuja, N. J., Nayyar, A., & Masud, M. (2021). Blended Learning Tools
and Practices: A Comprehensive Analysis. IEEE Access, 9.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085844
Kundu, A., Bej, T., &
Nath Dey, K. (2021). Time to Achieve: Implementing Blended Learning Routines in
an Indian Elementary Classroom. Journal of Educational Technology
Systems, 49(4), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520984406
Lalima, & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended
learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research,
5(1), 129-136. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1124666.pdf
López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., &
Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’
perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers and Education, 56(3),
818-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
Luca, J. (2006). Using Blended Learning to Enhance
Teaching and Learning. Proceedings of the Eighth Australasian Computing
Education Conference (ACE2006), 52.
McCown,
L. (2014). Blended courses: The best of online and traditional formats. Clinical
Laboratory Science, 23(4), 205-211.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M.
(2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of
the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307
Mukherjee,
A. (2024). Teacher-Educators’ Perspectives towards Blended Learning: A step Towards Futuristic
Trend in Education. IISRR-
International Journal of Research , 7(2), 37-48.
Mukhopadhyay, M.
(2001). Total quality Management in Education. New Delhi: NIEPA
Publication Unit
National Education Policy, 2020. Govt. of
India.https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
Norberg, A., Dziuban, C. D., & Moskal, P.
D. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On the horizon, 19(3),
207-2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111163913
Osguthorpe, R.T. & Graham, C.R. (2003). Blended Learning
Environments: Definitions and Directions. Quarterly Review of
Distance Education, 4(3), 227. ISSN 1528-3518
Ranjan, P. (2020). Is
blended learning better than online learning for B.Ed students? Journal
of Learning for Development, 7(3), 349-366.
Rovai, A.
P. & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A
Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses. International
Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1-13
Saboowala,
R. and Mishra, P.M. (2021). Readiness of In-service Teachers Toward a Blended
Learning Approach as a Learning Pedagogy in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Journal
of Educational Technology Systems, 50(1), 9–23.
Singh, H. (2003). Building
effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43,
51-54.
Tabor, S. W. (2007). Narrowing the Distance:
Implementing a Hybrid Learning Model for Information Security Education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1),
47-57.
Twigg, C. A. (2003). Improving learning and
reducing costs: new models for online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(5).ISSN
1527-6619. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/97374/
UNESCO
(2002). EFA Global Monitoring Report: Is the World on Track?
University Grants Commission. New Delhi. Blended mode of teaching and learning: Concept note.https://www.ugc.gov.in/pdfnews/6100340_Concept-Note-Blended-Mode-of-Teaching-and-Learning.pdf